Pre Teat to Bring Baby Hone From Hoapital

Breaking News

BREAKING – Iii studies published by the CDC, Uk Regime & Oxford Academy discover the Covid-nineteen Vaccines do not work

A graduate of Yale University who as well obtained a PHD at Princeton University and an Doctor degree from the John Hopkins University Schoolhouse of Medicine has published a paper in which she concludes that mandating the public to accept a vaccine is a harmful and damaging human activity because of excellent scientific research papers which clearly demonstrate the vaccines do not forestall infection or transmission of Covid-19.

Nina Pierpont (MD, PhD) published a newspaper on September 9th analysing various studies that were published in August 2021 which evidence the alleged Delta Covid-xix variant is evading the current Covid-nineteen injections on offer and therefore do not prevent infection or transmission of Covid-19.

The Doctor of Medicine explained in her published paper that vaccines aim to achieve two ends –

Protect the vaccinated person against the affliction
Keep vaccinated people from carrying the infection and transmitting information technology to others.

Withal, the Doctor of Medicine writes that herd immunity volition not be reached through vaccination considering new research in multiple settings shows that the alleged Delta variant produces very high viral loads which are just as high in the vaccinated population compared to the unvaccinated population.

Therefore, according to Nina Pierpont (Physician, PhD), vaccine mandates; such as the one at present enforced in the UK for all Care Dwelling house staff, have no justification because vaccinating individuals does not stop or even wearisome the spread of the alleged dominant Delta Covid-19 variant.

Which leads the Doctor of Medicine to conclude that natural immunity is much more protective than vaccination because all severities of Covid-19 illness produce healthy levels of natural immunity.

Nine Pierpont (Dr., PhD) cites three studies whose findings and data back up her conclusions and these include a study published August 6th 2021 in the Eye for Disease Control's (CDC) 'Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report', another study published August 10th 2021 past Oxford University, and a final written report published August 24th 2021 which was funded by the United kingdom of great britain and northern ireland Section for Health and Social Care.

CDC Study

The CDC study focused on 469 cases among Massachusetts residents who attended indoor and outdoor public gatherings over a two week menstruation. The results found that 346 of the cases were among vaccinated residents with 74% of them presenting with declared Covid-19 symptoms, and 1.ii% beingness hospitalised.

Notwithstanding the remaining 123 cases were among the unvaccinated population with just 1 person being hospitalised (0.8%. No deaths occurred in either group. The study also found that viral loads were found to be very similar among the vaccinated and unvaccinated, meaning they were as infectious.

Oxford University Study

The Oxford University study examined 900 hospital staff members in Vietnam who had been vaccinated with the Oxford / AstraZeneca viral vector injection betwixt March and April 2021. The unabridged hospital staff tested negative for the Covid-19 virus in mid May 2021 still, the first example among the vaccinated staff members was discovered on June 11th.

All 900 infirmary staff were then retested for the Covid-xix virus and 52 additional cases were identified immediately, forcing the hospital into lockdown. Over the side by side two weeks, sixteen additional cases were identified.

The study found that 76% of the Covid-19 positive staff adult respiratory symptoms, with 3 staff members developing pneumonia and 1 staff member requiring 3 days of oxygen therapy. Peak viral loads amid the fully vaccinated infected grouping were found to be 251 times college than peak viral loads found among the staff in March – April 2020 when they were non vaccinated.

United kingdom Section of Health & Social Care Study

The Great britain Department of Health & Social Care written report is an assay of ongoing population wide SARS-CoV-2 monitoring in the United kingdom and includes measures of viral load among the population.

The written report found that viral loads among the vaccinated and unvaccinated population are virtually the aforementioned, and much higher than had been recorded prior to the Covid-19 injection roll-out. The study also institute that the majority of cases among the vaccinated population were presenting with symptoms when they became positive.

The authors of the report conclude that the Pfizer and Oxford / AstraZeneca injection have lost efficacy against what they claim to be the Delta Covid-nineteen variant, but they maintain that they are substantially effective at keeping people from becoming infected with the Delta variant in the range of 67% to 80%.

Nine Pierpont (MD, PhD) rightly asks in her paper how they can conclude this when 82% of the random sample of new positive PCR tests in the written report were fully vaccinated people.

The Doc of Medicine writes –

'If a vaccine reduces the risk of becoming infected past two-thirds (67%), we would expect the proportion of vaccinated in the positive sample to be less than the proportion of vaccinated in the population.

Say we beginning with m people in the country, of whom we will randomly sample 100. The state is 80% vaccinated. This means that in our sample of 100 we accept 80 vaccinated and 20 unvaccinated people.

Permit's say that the virus has infected 10% of the people across the sampling period, or x total cases. If viii of the infected are amidst the vaccinated, and 2 in the unvaccinated (lxxx% and 20% of the positives, matching the ratio of vaccinated and unvaccinated in the population), the vaccine has fabricated no difference in whether one can get infected (0% efficacy). If the vaccine is 67% effective, the cases in the vaccinated group would be reduced by ii/iii to 2.67 cases, and the full cases would be only 4.67 cases (2.67 vaccinated and 2 unvaccinated).

This means that only two.67/four.67 or 57% of the cases would be in the vaccinated group, and 43% in the unvaccinated. (We tin can become back to x% overall being positive just using ratios, yielding v.seven cases amongst the vaccinated and 4.3 among the unvaccinated.)

This is why the proportion vaccinated in the infected sample, very close to the proportions vaccinated in the total population, are incompatible with the efficacy numbers generated by the authors.

It appears to me—as in the Massachusetts study—that the vaccine is not decreasing susceptibility to infection at all, and is in reality somewhere between slightly (insignificantly) decreasing susceptibility and slightly increasing susceptibility to the Delta variant.

The Uk study is clear that viral load (and thus infectiousness to others) is much greater with Delta than with Alpha, and that, with Delta, viral load and infectiousness are equal in vaccinated and unvaccinated infected people.'

The above three studies pb Nina Pierpont (MD, PhD) to conclude in her paper that mandating others to take a vaccine is a potentially harmful, dissentious act.

She writes that since the principal reason of a mandate is to protect others from infection, and these studies prove beyond a shadow of a doubt that they do not do this, those who mandate the Covid-19 injections may wish to seek legal counsel regarding their culpability and liability for potential long-lasting harm to those whom they pressure into vaccination with the threat of exclusion from employment, education or club.

The Exposé is now censored past
Google, Facebook, Twitter & PayPal
So nosotros need your help to ensure
we can go along to bring you the
facts the mainstream turn down to…